Agentic operations · for volunteer-run associations
Your association's busywork, investigated by an agent.
Every decision stays yours.
Boards run events on top of their studies: registrations, fees, teams, rooms, trips and dozens of messages. Bureau Agent finds what needs attention, investigates it with tools, and proposes one action with its evidence. Nothing is sent, changed or booked until an organizer approves it.
The guided demo shows the highlights; the full tour covers every feature. Both use the live agent on fictional sample data.
- 1Detect
Fixed checks read registrations, payments, teams and the inbox, and list what needs attention, blocking first.
- 2Investigate
An AI agent chooses tools, looks up records and rules, and proposes one action with evidence. Rules that must hold are enforced in code.
- 3You decide
Approve, edit or dismiss. The approval is what changes data or sends a reply, and it is logged.
The problem
Student boards run real operations with no operations team.
Registrations in a form, fees in a bank export, teams in a spreadsheet, questions in the inbox. Nobody sees the whole event.
An unpaid fee, a member in two teams or a missing room shows up on the day, when fixing it costs the most.
"Can my friend from another school join?" means reading the rules and the records before replying, dozens of times a week.
Operations console
Why you can trust it
The AI investigates. Code enforces the rules. People decide.
The agent only proposes. Every data change, reply and payment link waits for an organizer, and each approval is logged.
Eligibility, team sizes and budgets are verified by code, not by the model. Below a 0.70 identity match the agent must ask instead of acting.
Each proposal shows the tools used and the evidence found. Drafted replies say they were written with AI assistance (EU AI Act, Art. 50).